Nordic job posting data: ATS boards, aggregators, and access options
Sources for Nordic hiring-signal data compared: direct ATS boards (Workday, Greenhouse, Lever), aggregators, and scraper access with pricing.
Sources compared
| Source | Access | Price | ISIN | Coverage | Update cadence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct ATS boards | Public web | Free to read | no | Company-by-company | Live |
| Aggregators (Jobbsafari et al) | Web/APIs vary | Free-lookup, B2B feeds paid | no | Broad but deduped unclear | Daily |
| US ATS scrapers (Apify) | Apify actors | ~$0.08-0.10/job | no | US-centric company lists | On demand |
| Our actor (in build) | Apify actor | ~$0.10/job | no | SE/NO/DK/FI companies via their ATS boards | On demand |
Direct ATS boards: Structured HTML; needs one parser per ATS.
Aggregators (Jobbsafari et al): Posting duplication across boards is the data-quality trap.
US ATS scrapers (Apify): Proven paid niche; Nordic-only coverage is the gap.
Our actor (in build): Hiring-signal use: one record per job, no duplicates.
What our data adds
- US ATS scraping is a proven paid niche at $0.08/job
- No dedicated Nordic ATS aggregator found in store searches 2026-09-04
- Job boards change markup 2-4x/year: maintained actors beat DIY
Get the data
Apify actor: Nordic ATS Job Aggregator
PPE
More comparisons
- Swedish stock market data sources: free vs paid compared
- Swedish company data: Bolagsverket vs allabolag vs SCB vs our CSV
- Robotics datasets: 12 sources compared (supply chain, stocks, standards)
- npm package security data: npm API vs Snyk vs OSV vs GitHub Advisory
- Hemnet data access options compared (listings, sold prices, ToS reality)